Follow Us
twittergoogle_pluslinkedinrssyoutube
Subscribe to the BT Currents Blog

By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Recent Posts
The Legal Stuff
BT Currents - Hot Topics in Employment Law
0 0

07 Feb 2014 EEOC Releases Detailed FY 2013 Statistics Showing Highest Monetary Recovery in Agency History

As we previously reported, the EEOC issued its Performance and Accountability Report for FY 2013 in December, which in part summarized the agency’s activity from October 2012 through September 2013. As promised in December, the agency has released more detailed charge and litigation statistics for its FY 2013 activity, providing better insight into what is on its radar (and what employees are complaining about). Data tables provide detailed breakdowns for intake and resolution of charges, in addition to initiated and resolved litigation. A summary of…

READ MORE
0 0

03 Feb 2014 Split Decision: Top 5 Noncompete Stories Lean Slightly in Favor of Enforcement

One frequent question is whether there is a trend in favor of or against noncompete agreements. It has seemed to me in recent years that there is more noise suggesting the tide is turning against noncompete agreements, but these conclusions seemed to be based on anecdotal evidence at best, wishful thinking at worst. Law360 has published articles in recent years offering a list of noncompete decisions, with no reason to tilt the list one way or another, so it is interesting to look at the…

READ MORE
0 0

31 Jan 2014 FMLA Leave for Vacation? Yes, Under the Right Circumstances!

As any HR department will confirm, navigating the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) can be a tricky thing.  More than a few clients have lamented the never-ending struggle to curb FMLA abuse. That being said, a good dose of common sense and good employment counsel can go a long way in preventing future lawsuits. In the recent case of Ballard v. Chi. Park Dist. (found here), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a lower court’s ruling refusing to grant the CPD summary judgment on…

READ MORE
0 0

30 Jan 2014 Keep Your Nude Photos At Home, or They May End Up In Court

Last week, a New York state court directed a defendant to produce a disc of nude photos that are at the middle of a sexual harassment lawsuit. Danielle Pecile and Cristina Culicea both were employed by Titan Capital Group. According to Pecile and Culicea, Titan principal Russell Abrams gave each of them a CD of photos and asked them to take them to the drug store to develop the photos at the photo machine. Unbeknownst to each woman at the time, each CD allegedly contained…

READ MORE
0 0

29 Jan 2014 Supreme Court Rules That Donning And Doffing Time May Not Be Compensable

On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled in Sandifer v. U.S. Steel, unanimously holding that employees’ time spent donning and doffing protective gear was not compensable under the Fair Labor Standards Act because that time had been excluded from compensation in a collective bargaining agreement. A class of current and former U.S. Steel employees filed suit under the FLSA for back pay for time spent donning and doffing protective gear that U.S. Steel required them to wear. U.S. Steel claimed the time was not compensable under…

READ MORE
0 0

27 Jan 2014 Noncompetes: Michigan Decision Highlights Two Critical Decisions with Cease and Desist Letters

A decision out of the Eastern District of Michigan caught the attention of commentators last week. The pattern was straightforward and familiar – employee has noncompete, employee leaves and goes to work for a competitor, old employer sends new employer a copy of a letter to the employee telling the employee to cut it out because he has a noncompete. Things can go various directions from there. In this case, Bonds v. Phillips Electronic, the new employer fired the employee (Bonds), who in turn sued the old employer…

READ MORE
0 0

24 Jan 2014 Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals Analyzes the History of the ADAAA and Remands Case Involving “Temporary Disability” to District Court

In an opinion issued yesterday by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Summers v. Altarum Institute, Cause No. 12-1645, found here, employers received yet another reminder that the landscape of disability claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) significantly changed with the enactment of the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 (“ADAAA”), and care must be taken to ensure compliance with the ADAAA’s adjusted requirements. In this case, the plaintiff Carl Summers (“Summers”) worked for defendant Altarum Institute (“Altarum”) as a senior analyst…

READ MORE
0 0

24 Jan 2014 Third Circuit Rejects Plaintiff’s Claims That Entity To Whom She Provided Consulting Services Was Her “Employer” Under Title VII or the NJLAD

The Third Circuit has provided useful guidance to employers with respect to key factors to consider in implementing consulting relationships without generating an employment relationship under the law. Specifically, in Plaso v. IJKG, LLC et. al, found here, the Third Circuit accepted the holdings of the District Court for the District of New Jersey that the defendant did not constitute an “employer” for liability purposes under Title VII or the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD.) Though the opinion is deemed not precedential by the…

READ MORE
0 0

22 Jan 2014 Supreme Court to Examine First Amendment Retaliation Claim

Last Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a First Amendment retaliation claim brought by a public employee against his former employer following his termination after testifying against a state legislator. In Lane v. Central Alabama Community College, Steve Franks, Dr., the petitioner, Edward Lane, previously worked as the Director of the Central Alabama Community College’s Community Intensive Training for Youth Program (“Program”).  Shortly after joining as the Director, Lane audited the Program’s finances and discovered then-Alabama state representative, Suzanne Schmitz, was listed on…

READ MORE
0 0

21 Jan 2014 Play It Safe II: Employers At Risk If They Don’t Methodically Process ADA Issues

Just a few days ago, Pete Tschanz posted here about a court decision where it seemed from the court’s decision that the employer moved to terminate an employee without really working through some employee health issues as required by the ADA. Just to echo that theme with another new decision, we offer the case of Spurling v. C&M Fine Pack, Inc., where the 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals reversed a lower court’s summary decision in favor of the employer.   In short, the timeline in Spurling was…

READ MORE